“That such a constraining and technical ‘line-by-line’ process is accepted by so many as a useful or necessary approach speaks volumes about how neutered politics has become – apparently everyone must sign up to an agreed version of the latest ’science’ before any debate or discussion can begin.”

Tony Gilland asks some very valid questions about the neutrality of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Article on Spiked, here.

Posted Tuesday, July 17th, 2007 @ 2:38 am
Filed in environment, politics, science and tech

Permalink URL | Trackback URL | Comments on this post

Share post on
del.icio.us | Facebook | Reddit | Twitter
StumbleUpon | Ma.gnolia | Digg

Further reading

These posts may be related to the one above:

1. Property of Google
2. Census security
3. Iraq troops